Business

Monero Hashrate Tug-of-War Eases as Qubic Loses 51% Control

Explore how Monero’s hashrate battle unfolded in 2025, revealing the delicate balance of blockchain security and economic incentives behind Qubic’s brief 51% dominance and its aftermath.

Valeria Orlova's avatar
Valeria OrlovaStaff
4 min read

Key Takeaways

  • Qubic briefly controlled 52.72% of Monero’s hashrate in August 2025
  • Monero’s network showed resilience as Qubic’s dominance dropped to about 35%
  • Economic incentives can temporarily disrupt decentralized networks
  • Proof-of-Work remains costly to attack at scale, deterring long-term takeovers
  • Community action played a key role in restoring Monero’s decentralization
a gold coin with monero logo
Monero Hashrate Dynamics 2025

In August 2025, Monero (XMR), a leading privacy-focused cryptocurrency, faced a dramatic test of its network security. Qubic, a mining pool linked to IOTA co-founder Sergey Ivancheglo, briefly seized control of over 51% of Monero’s global hashrate, sparking alarms about potential blockchain manipulation. This episode, marked by a blockchain reorganization and community pushback, exposed the vulnerabilities and strengths of proof-of-work privacy coins. Here’s how Qubic’s strategic move unfolded, the network’s response, and what it means for the future of decentralized security.

Unpacking Monero’s Hashrate Battle

Monero’s network relies on Proof-of-Work (PoW), primarily using CPUs and less-efficient GPUs to keep mining accessible and decentralized. This design choice, while promoting inclusivity, results in a relatively low hashrate compared to giants like Bitcoin. Think of it as a cozy neighborhood watch rather than a city-wide police force. This smaller scale makes Monero more vulnerable to coordinated mining efforts by well-resourced groups. Enter Qubic, a mining pool led by Sergey Ivancheglo, which saw an opportunity to test the network’s limits.

Starting from a modest 2% share in May 2025, Qubic ramped up its mining power aggressively, reaching a staggering 52.72% in August. This wasn’t a random power grab but a calculated experiment to showcase their Useful Proof of Work (UPoW) model, which rewards miners with QUBIC tokens. By briefly controlling the majority of Monero’s hashrate, Qubic demonstrated how economic incentives can temporarily override organic decentralization, shaking the foundations of what many assumed was a secure privacy blockchain.

Qubic’s 51% Takeover Explained

When Qubic crossed the 51% threshold, it gained the technical ability to reorganize the blockchain, rewriting transaction history and enabling double-spending. Imagine having the power to erase and rewrite parts of a public ledger—this is the nightmare scenario for any blockchain. Qubic reorganized six blocks, a move that sent ripples through the crypto community and raised urgent security concerns.

However, this takeover was not a stealthy hack but a deliberate demonstration. Qubic’s mission was to prove the viability of outsourced computations and economic incentives in mining. By rerouting Monero’s block rewards through its infrastructure, Qubic aimed to secure the protocol long term under its miners’ control. This bold move rewrote the rules of blockchain competition, showing how a smaller protocol could dominate a larger one with the right incentives.

Community’s Resilient Response

Monero’s community didn’t sit idle. Recognizing the threat, miners and developers coordinated a pushback that included distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) attacks targeting Qubic’s pool and media alerts to warn exchanges and users. Crypto exchange Kraken paused XMR deposits as a security precaution, underscoring the seriousness of the situation. This collective defense showcased the power of decentralized governance and community vigilance.

As a result, Qubic’s hashrate dominance dropped from over 51% to just above 35%, stabilizing the network’s control. The hashrate settled around 5.3 GH/s, below the attack peak but above historical averages. This episode proved that while economic incentives can disrupt networks, coordinated community action can restore balance and protect blockchain integrity.

Economic Incentives Driving Disruption

Qubic’s campaign was fueled by economic incentives rather than pure malice. By rewarding miners with QUBIC tokens, the pool attracted significant mining power, illustrating how financial rewards can rapidly shift network security dynamics. This experiment highlighted a critical truth: even well-established proof-of-work blockchains can be temporarily unsettled if the incentives align.

Yet, maintaining a majority share came at a steep price—estimated at $75 million per day. This enormous cost acts as a natural deterrent against sustained attacks, reinforcing the idea that economic feasibility is a key pillar of blockchain security. Qubic’s experiment, while disruptive, was ultimately unsustainable, emphasizing that long-term decentralization depends on balancing incentives with costs.

Lessons for Privacy Coins’ Future

Monero’s hashrate tug-of-war offers a wake-up call for privacy-focused cryptocurrencies relying on proof-of-work. It dispels the myth that CPU-centric, widely distributed blockchains are invulnerable to takeover attempts. Instead, it reveals that economic incentives and technical organization can briefly tip the scales.

The episode underscores the necessity of active community engagement, diversified mining pools, and vigilant governance to maintain network health. It also highlights regulatory risks, as exchanges like Kraken paused deposits amid security concerns. Moving forward, privacy coins must evolve their security budgets and incentive structures to withstand similar challenges. Monero’s resilience in this crisis is a testament to decentralized defense—but the fight to safeguard privacy and trust in blockchain networks is far from over.

Long Story Short

Monero’s 2025 hashrate tug-of-war with Qubic serves as a vivid reminder that even privacy-centric, CPU-friendly blockchains aren’t immune to concentrated mining power. Yet, the swift community response and the high economic cost of maintaining dominance underscore the resilience built into decentralized systems. For users and developers alike, this episode highlights the importance of vigilance, diversified mining, and evolving incentive models to safeguard network integrity. As Monero steadies itself, the broader crypto world gains a valuable case study in balancing innovation with security. The fight to protect privacy and decentralization continues, fueled by lessons learned and the relentless spirit of its community.

Finsights

From signal to strategy — insights that drive better decisions.

Must Consider

Things to keep an eye on — the factors that could influence your takeaway from this story/topic

Core considerations

Monero’s 2025 hashrate episode reveals that proof-of-work privacy coins face real risks from concentrated mining power, especially when economic incentives align. While community action can restore balance, the high cost of attacks is a critical defense. However, relying solely on economic deterrence and decentralized vigilance may not suffice as blockchain ecosystems grow more complex. Future security strategies must blend technical innovation with robust governance to prevent repeat dominance attempts.

Key elements to understand

Our Two Cents

Our no-nonsense take on the trends shaping the market — what you should know

Our take

If you’re watching privacy coins like Monero, this episode is a reminder: decentralization isn’t a set-it-and-forget-it deal. Economic incentives can lure miners away, shaking network stability. Staying informed and supporting diverse mining pools helps keep the balance. For developers, innovating incentive models without compromising security will be key to future-proofing privacy blockchains.

Trends that shape the narrative

Similar Reads

Latest articles on Business